|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Water |
|
|
| Sludges |
|
|
|
| Clay Liner 0-6" |
|
|
|
| Clay Liner 6"-12" |
|
|
|
| Lagoon Berm 0-6" |
|
|
|
| Lagoon Berm 6"-12" |
|
|
|
|
|
Soil/Sludge |
|
|
| Soil Base |
|
|
|
|
|
Trapped Fines |
|
|
| Aggregate Media |
|
|
|
The sources of the Table 1 are as follows:
5. NPL Status
The August 22, 1985, Consent Decree addresses six sites including the Winston Thomas facility. The Winston Thomas site is not on the National Priorities List but four of the six sites that are being remediated under the 1985 Consent Decree are on the National Priorities List.
B. Other Actions to Date
1. Previous Actions
In 1987, CBS, as part of the interim measures associated with the Consent Decree, removed 477 tons of sediments from Clear Creek near the Winston Thomas facility. In addition, as discussed in section A 1, above, three time-critical removal actions have been
completed by CBS, with U.S. EPA oversight. The removal action on west side of Clear Creek was completed on November 19, 1997, and 8,700 tons PCBs were removed. Another time-critical removal action for the drying beds and sludge digesters is essentially complete with a limited excavation along with verification sampling remaining. This second removal action should be completed by July 1998. A third time-critical removal action for the interim storage facility was completed on February 13, 1998.
During November 1997 through January 1998, U.S. EPA's contractor Earth Tech completed an Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA) for the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter.
2. Current Actions
The EE/CA was released for public comment on February 26, 1998, and a 30-day public comment period was held until March 27, 1998. A public meeting was held on Tuesday, March 10, 1998, in Bloomington, Indiana. A summary of the comments and U.S. EPA's responses are attached hereto, and are part of the administrative record supporting the selected response action.
C. State and Local Authorities Role
1. State and Local Action to Date
In August 1985, the U.S. EPA, State of Indiana, Monroe County, the City of Bloomington and CBS signed a Consent Decree to remediate six sites in the Bloomington area, which included Winston Thomas. CBS and the City of Bloomington as owner, operator of Winston Thomas are responsible parties but a majority of the cleanup is being financed by CBS. As parties to the Consent Decree, the City of Bloomington, Monroe County, and the State of Indiana have provided both technical and legal comments on documents. In addition, representatives from the governmental parties have provided periodic oversight for the removal activities at the Winston Thomas site.
2. Potential for continued State/Local Response
The City of Bloomington, Monroe County, and State of Indiana are expected to continue to assist U.S. EPA in the pursuit of the response actions proposed herein as well as any further action that may be deemed necessary at the Site. Involvement by the governmental parties will continue until site completion.
III. THREAT TO PUBLIC HEALTH OR THE ENVIRONMENT, AND STATUTORY
AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
The U.S. EPA completed a determination of cleanup criteria for the Winston Thomas site and this information is contained in the EE/CA. In calculating cleanup levels which are protective of public health and the environment, the U.S. EPA used PCBs as the chemical of concern and evaluated two types of commercial/industrial future use exposure scenarios. These scenarios address dermal absorption and ingestion of soils contaminated with PCBs for on-site construction/utility workers and on-site industrial maintenance workers.
The risk evaluation determined that the risk to construction/utility workers and on-site industrial maintenance workers exceeded U.S. EPA's acceptable risk range for both carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks. The U.S. EPA did not complete an ecological risk assessment, but did consult with U.S. Fish and Wildlife and U.S. EPA ecological experts and determined that PCB concentrations at the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter were unacceptable.
A. Threats to Public Health or Welfare
The U.S. EPA determined that the PCB contamination within the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter was outside the acceptable carcinogenic risk range of 10-4 to 10-6 excess cancer risk and noncarcinogenic Hazard Index greater than 1. Using the U.S. EPA's point of departure of 10-5 excess cancer risk, the Agency has determined that the cleanup level of 15 parts per million of total PCBs on average, with a not to exceed value of 25 ppm for total PCBs would be protective of human health. The stone within the trickling filter and the walls of the trickling filter will be remediated to a 10 ug/100 cm2 standard.
B. Threats to the Environment
A formal ecological risk assessment was not completed, but based upon sites with similar habitats, a cleanup criteria of 15 ppm, not to exceed 25 ppm would be acceptable if one foot of clean fill would be placed over the excavated areas in the tertiary lagoon and abandoned lagoons.
Conditions at the Winston Thomas site present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare and the environment based upon factors set forth in the National Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR 300.415(b)(2). These factors include:
(i) Actual or potential exposure to nearby human populations, animals or the food chain from hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants;
This factor is present at the Winston Thomas site due to the existence of high levels of PCBs in surface and near surface sludge and soils. In addition, standing water within the tertiary lagoon contains PCBs at unacceptable levels. PCBs are defined as hazardous substances in 40 CFR Part 302.4. As described in Table 1, PCBs were discovered in sludge as high as 5,700 ppm within the tertiary lagoon. Soils under the sludge in the tertiary lagoon were as high as 860 ppm. The abandoned lagoons has sludge/soil as high as 700 ppm for PCB. These values are greater than the 15 ppm on average, not to exceed 25 ppm cleanup level calculated in the risk assessment. In addition, since water contaminated with PCBs are present in the tertiary lagoon, there is an exposure to wildlife either within the tertiary lagoon or if releases occur into Clear Creek from the tertiary lagoon.
(ii) Hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants in drums, barrels, tanks, or other bulk storage containers that may pose a threat of release;
This factor is present at the Winston Thomas site due to the presence of the trickling filter which is a concrete basin containing stone and fine particles/debris containing PCBs. PCBS have been discovered in the fine material present between the stone as high as 146 ppm. Based upon some catastrophic event, release of PCBs could occur from the trickling filter.
(iii) high levels of hazardous substances or pollutants or contaminants in water, sludge, and soils largely at the surface that may migrate;
This factor is present at the Winston Thomas site due to the existence of PCBs in the sludge and soils near the surface at the tertiary lagoon and abandoned lagoons. Water in the 17-acre tertiary lagoon is also contaminated with PCBs that could migrate to Clear Creek.
IV. ENDANGERMENT DETERMINATION
Given the site conditions, the nature of the hazardous substances on-site, and the potential exposure pathways to nearby populations and ecological receptors as described in Sections II and III above, actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the site, if not addressed by implementing the response actions selected in this Action Memorandum, may present an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment.
V. PROPOSED ACTIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS
In the EE/CA, an analysis of six alternative response actions were initially reviewed with two alternatives (vault containment with TSCA landfill disposal and primary thermal treatment) being screened out due to excessive cost without a significant benefit in risk reduction. A detailed analysis of the four remaining alternatives was performed in the EE/CA for cleanup of the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter. The four removal alternatives are as follows:
Alternative 1 consists of excavating material greater than an arithmetic average of 15 ppm PCBs and not to exceed 25 ppm PCBs and disposing of the material in an off-site licensed landfill. The following is an estimate of the contaminated material at the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter:
Material greater than or equal to 50 ppm for PCBs will have to be disposed of in a TSCA landfill. Material less than 50 ppm will be disposed of in a special waste landfill. Disposal in an offsite facility must meet the requirements of the U.S. EPA Off-site Rule, 40 CFR 300.440, 58 Federal Register 49215. Water within the tertiary lagoon may require treatment with activated carbon prior to discharge to the City of Bloomington, Dillman Road Wastewater Treatment Facility. Wet sludge/soil will need to be dewatered prior to disposal and the water generated from the filter presses (process water) may also require treatment prior to discharge to the Dillman Road Facility. After excavation to the cleanup level, a one foot soil cover will be required over excavated areas in the tertiary lagoon and the abandoned lagoons for protection of wildlife. The estimated cost for this Alternative is $18.9 million.
Alternative 2 is identical to Alternative I but all the material contaminated with PCBs would be disposed of in a TSCA landfill. The estimated cost for this Alternative is $24.2 million.
Alternative 3 proposes to use thermal treatment to treat the PCB contaminated material. Three types of thermal treatment were evaluated within the EE/CA: high temperature incineration, thermal desorption and in-situ thermal desorption. The material greater than 15 ppm for PCBs and not to exceed 25 ppm for PCBs. The residuals from the thermal treatment would have to be disposed of off-site in a landfill. The cost for this Alternative is from $17.4 million to $18.5 million, depending on the technology used.
Alternative 4 is similar to Alternative 1, but instead of disposing of the trickling filter stone in a landfill, the trickling filter stone will be cleaned and reused. The estimated cost for Alternative 4 is $17.7 million.
After review of the four Alternatives and consideration in the EE/CA of U.S. EPA's nine criteria, response action Alternative 4 was identified as the preferred response action in the EE/CA. Public comments were received and considered and response action Alternative 4 remains the preferred alternative and is selected in this Action Memorandum, as modified in this paragraph. A responsiveness summary containing summary of the comments received and U.S. EPA's responses are included in the administrative record for this Action Memorandum.
In light of the City of Bloomington's possible future use of the Winston Thomas site for storm water retention, some modification to the proposed one foot of soil cover over excavated areas in the tertiary lagoon is appropriate. Specifically, rather than requiring a full foot of soil immediately, only six inches of soil cover will need to be applied initially in the tertiary lagoon. In addition, the requirement for the initial six inches of soil cover may be modified for any portion or portions of the tertiary lagoon after excavation (a) if CBS demonstrates to the parties that PCB contamination levels are below 1 ppm, in which no soil cover shall be required for applicable portion or portions, or (b) to account for grading as described below. The parties recognize that even if modifications to the initial six inch requirement are made some soil cover may be necessary for purposes of erosion control and support for a vegetative cover which may be reflected in the approved Plan discussed below. Within thirty days after excavation and sampling are completed, CBS shall provide the parties with its "Soil Cover Plan" for their review and approval, which may include a request for variances. The On-Scene Coordinator may grant CBS additional minor variances to the soil cover approved under the Plan.
The additional six inches of soil cover must be applied within two years after completion of the excavation in the tertiary lagoon unless (a) the City of Bloomington has started construction on a future use for the tertiary lagoon which would make additional cover unnecessary, or (b) CBS has presented data and information clearly demonstrating that leaving the existing soil cover over the tertiary lagoon will not result in a threat to human health or the environment. Prior to installing any additional soil cover, CBS will submit a "Supplemental Soil Cover Plan" for the parties' review and approval, which may include a request for variances. If appropriate, and if there is a demonstration by CBS of a lack of threats posed by any PCBs remaining in the tertiary lagoon, then this Action Memorandum may be amended by U.S. EPA to no longer require the additional six inches of soil cover. Such a demonstration may include the City's plans for future use of the tertiary lagoon. U.S. EPA may also modify the requirement for an additional six inches of soil cover for any portion or portions of the tertiary lagoon to account for grading. The On-Scene Coordinator may grant CBS additional minor variances to the soil cover approved under the Supplemental Plan.
With respect to the initial and additional soil cover requirements described above, one-half of the requisite soil necessary for each phase shall be provided by the City and the remaining one-half by CBS. CBS will be responsible for applying the soil at the site.
The soil cover requirements for the abandoned lagoon are unchanged from the preferred alternative as identified in the EE/CA.
Prior to commencing any site activities, the following plans will have to be reviewed, approved and be consistent with the Statement of Work, which is an attachment to the stipulation:
1. Trickling Filter Workplan which will include site preparation, removal and project approach, site controls which includes health and safety, air monitoring, sampling and analysis and a schedule for completion.
2. Tertiary Lagoon Workplan which includes site preparation, removal approach, site controls (health and safety, air monitoring, sampling and analysis, water collection), schedule for completion and transportation and disposal.
3. Abandoned Lagoons Workplan which includes site preparation, removal approach, site controls (health and safety, air monitoring, sampling and analysis, water collection), schedule for completion and transportation and disposal.
In addition, within 60 days after the Completion of Work Report, CBS must submit to the governmental parties a Groundwater Monitoring Plan which will include the number and placement of monitoring wells, chemical and physical parameters to be sampled and the frequency and duration of sampling to be conducted.
The On-Scene Coordinator has begun planning for provision of post removal site control consistent with the provisions of Section 300.415 (1) of the NCP.
The response actions described in this memorandum directly address actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants at Winston Thomas which may pose an imminent and substantial endangerment to public health and safety, and to the environment.
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs)
All applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) of Federal law will be complied with the extent practicable. ARARS have been identified within the EE/CA and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management has provided ARARs revisions as necessary. The ARARs identified in the EE/CA appear as listed on Attachment 1 to this Action Memorandum.
VI. CHANGE IN THE SITUATION SHOULD ACTION BE DELAYED OR NOT TAKEN
Delayed or non-action may result in increased likelihood of a direct contact threat of high PCB concentrations to human or wildlife populations accessing the site. PCB contamination may also migrate into Clear Creek from the Winston Thomas site if the removal action does not take place, threatening the environment and exacerbating the levels of PCBs in the aquatic biota in Clear Creek.
VII. OUTSTANDING POLICY ISSUES
None.
VIII. ENFORCEMENT
The Potentially Responsible Parties for this action are CBS, as generator of the hazardous substances found at the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter, and the City of Bloomington, as owner/operator of the site. Under the Consent Decree, however, the parties (including CBS) waived their claims against the City, and the stipulation to be submitted to the Court does not change the terms of that waiver. Because the work contemplated by this Action Memorandum is to be conducted pursuant to a stipulation to be signed by the parties modifying the 1985 Consent Decree, no enforcement addendum has been prepared.
IX. RECOMMENDATION
This decision document represents the selected removal action for the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter, located in Bloomington, Monroe County, Indiana. This decision document has been developed in accordance with CERCLA, as amended, and is not inconsistent with the NCP. This decision is based on the Administrative Record for this site. Conditions at the site meet the NCP section 300.415(b)(2) criteria for a removal. No funding has been specifically budgeted for the removal actions proposed for the Site. However, the PRP, CBS has agreed to undertake the proposed removal actions described in this Action Memorandum. The estimated costs associated with the response actions identified in this Action Memorandum are approximately $17.7 million. I recommend your approval of the removal actions proposed in this Action Memorandum. You may indicate your decision by signing below.
APPROVE: William E. Muno, Director Superfund Division 5/12/98
Attachment 1: List of Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Attachment 2: Administrative record for Winston Thomas Waste Water treatment Plant site, tertiary logoon, abandoned lagoons, and trickling filter, Bloomington, Indiana.
Figure 1: Site Location Map, Winston Thomas Wastewater Treatment Facility, Bloomington, Indiana.
Figure 2: Site Map, Winston Thomas Wastewater Treatment Facility, Bloomington, Indiana.
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
205 N. College Ave. - Ste. 713 - P.O. Box 665 - Bloomington, IN 47402-0665 USA Voice: +1.812.333.8888 - Fax: +1.812.332.8511 - BBS: +1.812.333.8822 For more info, e-mail info@copa.org. Please send site input to webmaster@copa.org. Copyright © 1990-98 COPA, Inc. All rights reserved. See legal page for terms of use and disclaimers. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. Subscribe to the COPA Mailing List and stay informed on PCBs. |
|||||||||||||||