|
|
|||||||||||||||
CIC Meeting Summary, June 8, 1999
This meeting had two distinct parts. The first was Tom Alcamo (EPA) giving a summary of the progress at the sites. This information is summarized by the EPA document Bloomington Sites Cleanup Status, June 1999, distributed at the meeting. The following is a summary of this information, with extra information revealed at the meeting.
Neal's Landfill The first phase of cleanup activities at the Neal's Landfill site started April 19, 1999, by CBS Corp. Excavation of the north slope is 40% complete, and excavation on the southeast side has begun. About 25,000 tires were found during excavation, and will be shredded and put on top of the consolidated material, just under the cap/liner. The final landfill area will be reduced from 18 acres to 10 acres through off-site disposal and consolidation. A clay and a membrane liner will be installed over the landfill to prevent water from penetrating into the contaminated material. The final cap is scheduled to be completed by December 2000. Current data from five air monitoring locations around the Neal's Landfill site and personal air monitors indicate that airborne PCB levels are well below levels of health concern.
Neal's Dump
Bennett's Quarry
Lemon Lane Landfill
Winston-Thomas To date, everything on the site property except the tertiary lagoon has been cleaned up to standards that will allow future industrial development of the property. Cleanup of the 17-acre tertiary lagoon is scheduled to be completed by September 1999. Sludge containing PCBs is being removed and disposed of in an off-site landfill that is permitted to handle PCBs. Some portions of the berm contain material that as less than 25 ppm, while the lagoon bottom is expected to test at less than 1 ppm.
Part 2The second half of the meeting was filled with discussion about the usefulness of the CIC itself. The question was whether it is simply a forum for the EPA to share the information about the sites, or if it also serves to funnel input from the community back to the EPA. In its first years the CIC was narrowly defined as conduit of information to the community, but not from it. It was thought by EPA that citizens could best represent their interests through their government officials, city, county and state, who were signatories to the Consent Decree, which governed the cleanup. Stubbornly, members of the CIC brought up issues that they felt the EPA needed to hear. It was pressure from CIC members that brought the EPA to the conclusion that a water treatment plant was needed at ICS as soon as possible.Still, officially the meetings are not set up to take input. Many times citizen agenda items are put to the end, and never fully heard. The EPA expressed the desire to hear and consider citizen concerns, if they are limited agenda items rather than open debate. The CIC determined that they should meet again before the next EPA meeting, and develop an agenda of concerns that are time delimited, and can be expected to get adequately covered in the time allowed. |
|
Warning! Eat no fish from Clear Creek, Pleasant Run, Salt or Richland Creeks.
|
|||
COPA For more info, e-mail info@copa.org. Copyright © 1990-2002 COPA, Inc. All rights reserved. See legal page for terms of use and disclaimers. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. |
|||