************************************************************* SOLIDIFICATION This profile provides the following general information about this treatment process: 1. Description 2. Applicability 3. Limitations 4. Availability and vendor list 5. Performance data and field applications 6. Sources of information for this profile 1. Description: IN-SITU SOLIDIFICATION Solidification/stabilization (S/S) reduces the mobility of hazardous substances and contaminants in the environment through both physical and chemical means. Unlike other remedial technologies, S/S seeks to trap or immobilize contaminants within their "host" medium (i.e., the soil, sand,and/or building materials that contain them), instead of removing them through chemical or physical treatment. Leachability testing is typically performed to measure the immobilization of contaminants. In situ S/S techniques use auger/caisson systems and injector head systems to apply S/S agents to in situ soils. S/S techniques can be used alone or combined with other treatment and disposal methods to yield a product or material suitable for land disposal or, in other cases, that can be applied to beneficial use. These techniques have been used as both final and interim remedial measures. EX-SITU SOLIDIFICATION As for in situ solidification/stabilization (S/S), ex situ S/S contaminants are physically bound or enclosed within a stabilized mass (solidification), or chemical reactions are induced between the stabilizing agent and contaminants to reduce their mobility (stabilization). Ex situ S/S, however, typically requires disposal of the resultant materials. 2. APPLICABILITY: The target contaminant group for in situ S/S is inorganics (including radionuclides). The technology has limited effectiveness against SVOCs and pesticides and no expected effectiveness against VOCs; however, systems designed to be more effective in treating organics are being developed and tested. 3. LIMITATIONS: Factors that may limit the applicability and effectiveness of IN-SITU SOLIDIFICATION include: 1. Depth of contaminants may limit some types of application processes. 2. Future usage of the site may "weather" the materials and affect ability to maintain immobilization of contaminants. 3. Some processes result in a significant increase in volume (up to double the original volume). 4. Certain wastes are incompatible with variations of this process. 5. Treatability studies are generally required. 6. Reagent delivery and effective mixing are more difficult than for ex situ applications. 7. Like all in situ treatments, confirmatory sampling can be more difficult than for ex situ treatments. Factors that may limit the applicability and effectiveness of EX-SITU SOLIDIFICATION include: 1. Environmental conditions may affect the long-term immobilization of contaminants. 2. Some processes result in a significant increase in volume (up to double the original volume). 3. Certain wastes are incompatible with different processes. Treatability studies are generally required. 4. VOCs are generally not immobilized. 5. Long-term effectiveness has not been demonstrated for many contaminant/ process combinations. 4. AVAILABILITY AND VENDOR LIST Solidification is commercially availabile from a number of vendors, listed below: Advanced Remediation Mixing (504) 461-0466 Chemfix Technologies, Inc. (504) 461-0466 Funderburk & Associates (903) 545-2004 International Waste Technologies (316) 269-2660 Geo-Con, Inc. (412) 856-7700 Hazco Separation and Recovery Systems, Inc. (714) 261-8860 Silicate Technology Corporation (602) 948-7100 S.M.W. Seiko, Inc. (510) 783-4105 Soliditech, Inc. (713) 497-8558 STC Omega (602) 948-7100 VFL WASTECH, Inc. (615) 483-6515 Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc. (603) 929-3000 5. PERFORMANCE DATA AND FIELD APPLICATIONS S/S technologies are well demonstrated, can be applied to the most common site and waste types, require conventional materials handling equipment, and are available competitively from a number of vendors. Most reagents and additives are also widely available and relatively inexpensive industrial commodities. In situ S/S processes have demonstrated the capability to reduce the mobility of contaminated waste by greater than 95%.The effects, over the long term, of weathering (e.g., freeze-thaw cycles, acid precipitation, and wind erosion), groundwater infiltration, and physical disturbance associated with uncontrolled future land use can significantly affect the integrity of the stabilized mass and contaminant mobility in ways that cannot be predicted by laboratory tests. Depending upon the original contaminants and the chemical reactions that take place in the ex situ S/S process, the resultant stabilized mass may have to be handled as a hazardous waste. For certain types of radioactive waste, the stabilized product must be capable of meeting stringent waste form requirements for disposal (e.g., Class B or Class C low level materials). Remediation of a site consisting of 18,200 metric tons (20,000 tons) could require less than 1 month, depending on equipment size and type and soil properties (e.g., percent solids and particle size). DOE has demonstrated the Polyethylene Encapsulation of Radionuclides and Heavy Metals (PERM) process at the bench scale. The process is a waste treatment and stabilization technology for high-level mixed waste. Specific targeted contaminants include radionuclides (e.g., cesium, strontium, and cobalt), and toxic metals (e.g., chromium, lead, and cadmium). The process should be ready for implementation in FY95. 6. Source: Marks, Peter J., Walter J. Wujcik and Amy F. Loncar, October 1994. REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES SCREENING MATRIX AND REFERENCE GUIDE, SECOND EDITION. DOD Environmental Technology Transfer Committee. NTIS No. PB95-104782. Reproduced for the Bloomington, Indiana PCB Superfund Sites Bulletin Board with the permission of USAEC, SFIM-AEC-ETD, APG, MD. Supplemented by MVA Consulting, Inc. *************************************************************