FROM: COPA Citizens Opposed to PCB Ash P.O. box 665 Bloomington, IN 47402-0665 TO: U.S. E.P.A Mr. Dan Hopkins 77 Jackson St. Chicago, IL Dear Dan, After years of debate and discussion as to whether an RI/FS was done for the Bloomington sites, it has been acknowledged by EPA that one was not done. As we move toward finding a solution to the complex problems the Bloomington PCB sites present, we have been told that something close to an RI/FS will be done. COPA and others in the community have for years asked that a formal RI/FS be done to characterize the sites and end speculation as to how bad the contamination is before a solution is reached. We see no reason why a full RI/FS according to superfund law should not be done in Bloomington. There is no need for an equivalent since we can find no justification for not doing an RI/FS. We also feel immediate source control should be implemented to prevent contaminants from entering groundwater, surface water, and air. We can see no reason to continue allowing contaminants to escape the sites. When will water discharging from the Illinois Central Springs be captured and treated? What options are under consideration, who is evaluating the options, and are the consent decree parties in agreement over this issue? COPA would like written responses to our questions, and would like a letter explaining EPA's decision on doing a full RI/FS. We all realize the complexity of the issues facing you and understand the constraints of the consent decree. What continues to be bothersome is the fact that source control and water treatment have not been implemented, and for years contaminants have continued to enter the environment and poison our waterways and wildlife. It took years of citizen complaining about discharges from Illinois Central before a fence was erected around the site. Unfortunately, the contaminants keep flowing under the fence and on downstream. How can EPA continue to let this happen? In the past when any of these questions have been raised, you have indicated that constraints of the consent decree or present EPA practices at municipal landfills as a defense. Please list any superfund sites in the United States that are municipal landfills, located in sink holes on karst, contaminated with the concentrations of PCBs known to exist in Bloomington. Bloomington has always been treated differently by EPA in regards to the legal requirments of CERCLA, the Superfund Law. We would appreciate a prompt reply to this request for an RI/FS. Sincerely, Mike Baker COPA