2.0 SITE PROFILES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-1 2.1 ANDERSON ROAD LANDFILL. . . . . . . . . . . . .2-3 2.1.1 Site Description. . . . . . . . . . .2-3 2.1.2 Site History. . . . . . . . . . . . .2-3 2.1.3 Nature of Contamination . . . . . . .2-4 2.1.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements . .2-4 2.2 BENNETT STONE QUARRY. . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-4 2.2.1 Site Description. . . . . . . . . . .2-4 2.2.2 Site History. . . . . . . . . . . . .2-7 2.2.3 Nature of Contamination . . . . . . .2-8 2.2.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements . .2-8 2.3 LEMON LANE LANDFILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2-8 2.3.1 Site Description. . . . . . . . . . .2-8 2.3.2 Site History. . . . . . . . . . . . 2-11 2.3.3 Nature of Contamination . . . . . . 2-12 2.3.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements . 2-12 2.4 NEAL'S DUMP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-12 2.4.1 Site Description. . . . . . . . . . 2-12 2.4.2 Site History. . . . . . . . . . . . 2-15 2.4.3 Nature of Contamination . . . . . . 2-15 2.4.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements . 2-17 2.5 NEAL'S LANDFILL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-17 2.5.1 Site Description. . . . . . . . . . 2-17 2.5.2 Site History. . . . . . . . . . . . 2-19 2.5.3 Nature of Contamination . . . . . . 2-20 2.5.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements . 2-20 2.6 WINSTON-THOMAS SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT . . . . 2-22 2.6.1 Site Description. . . . . . . . . . 2-22 2.6.2 Site History. . . . . . . . . . . . 2-24 2.6.3 Nature of Contamination . . . . . . 2-25 2.6.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements . 2-25 2.7 SUMMARY OF MATERIALS TO BE TREATED. . . . . . 2-27 2.7.1 Physical Characteristics of Contaminated Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-28 2.7.1.1 Soil and Rock. . . . . . . . . 2-28 2.7.1.2 Sludge . . . . . . . . . . . . 2-28 2.7.1.3 Sediment . . . . . . . . . . . 2-29 2.7.1.4 Solid Waste. . . . . . . . . . 2-29 2.7.2 Volume of Contaminated Materials. . 2-32 2.7.3 Chemical Characteristics of Primary Contaminants of Concern . . . . . . . . . . . 2-34 2.7.3.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls. . . 2-34 2.7.3.2 Dioxins and Furans . . . . . . 2-35 LIST OF TABLES 2-1 ANDERSON ROAD LANDFILL SITE CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS. . .2-5 2-2 BENNETT STONE QUARRY SITE CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS. . . .2-9 2-3 LEMON LANE LANDFILL SITE CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS . . . 2-13 2-4 NEAL'S DUMP SITE CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS . . . . . . . 2-16 2-5 NEAL'S LANDFILL SITE CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS . . . . . 2-21 2-6 WINSTON-THOMAS SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT SITE CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS............................2-26 2-7 GENERAL COMPONENTS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE . . . . . . . 2-31 2-9 VOLUME ESTIMATES FOR MATERIAL FROM THE SIX SITES. . . . . 2-33 2-10 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF AROCLORS . . . . . . 2-36 2-11 ESTIMATED DIOXIN AND FURAN BOILING POINTS. . . . . . . . 2-38 2.0 SITE PROFILES Westinghouse is required to remove and treat an estimated 627,000 yd3 of PCB-contaminated material from six sites located in the Bloomington, Indiana, area (see Figure 2-1). These sites are the Anderson Road Landfill, Bennett Stone Quarry, Lemon Lane Landfill, Neal's Dump, Neal's Landfill, and Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant. Limited information concerning the description and history of each of the sites was obtained from the "Preliminary Data Evaluation and Pathway Analyses Report for Consent Decree" prepared by the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) (ISDH 1994). The report also identifies the nature of contamination at each site. Thorough investigations of the six sites have not been conducted; however, limited environmental sampling activities have been conducted at all of the six sites. The "Preliminary Data Evaluation and Pathway Analyses Report for Consent Decree" presents the concentration range or maximum concentration of PCBs and other contaminants that have been detected at concentrations of concern at the six sites. ISDH identifies a chemical as a contaminant of concern based on the following factors: - The comparison of on- and off-site chemical concentrations with public health assessment comparison values for (1) noncarcinogenic endpoints and (2) carcinogenic endpoints - A chemical has no comparison value that may be toxic to humans at specified levels - An evaluation of the field data quality, laboratory data quality, and sampling network design - Community health concerns related to a particular chemical Other contaminants have been detected in environmental media at concentrations that do not present a risk to human health or the environment. However, it is possible that the source of these contaminants, such as landfilled wastes and the tertiary sludge lagoon, contain the contaminants at significantly higher concentrations. The CD has not established cleanup goals or objectives for any of the other contaminants except for PCBs. Sections 2.1 through 2.6 below describe the six sites and discuss site history, nature of site contamination, and Phase II remediation requirements for each site. The final section, Section 2.7, summarizes the materials to be treated. 2.1 ANDERSON ROAD LANDFILL The sections below describe the Anderson Road Landfill site, its site history, nature of contamination, and remediation requirements for the site as specified in the CD. 2.1.1 Site Description The Anderson Road Landfill site, currently known as the Monroe County Landfill, is a sanitary landfill located 11 miles northeast of Bloomington in Monroe County, Indiana. The site is located in a sparsely populated area where 30 to 45 people reside within a 0.5-mile radius of the site. No schools, nursing homes, parks, or hospitals are located in the site vicinity. Data logs of private wells within a 1-mile radius of the site indicate that most wells penetrate into and derive very little water from the shale and siltstone bedrock. Washington Township Water Company supplies water to all homes in the area. 2.1.2 Site History In the 1960s and 1970s, a 0.75-acre area at the Anderson Road Landfill site was used by Westinghouse to dispose of PCB- contaminated capacitors and materials. Only the portion of the site where the PCB-contaminated materials were disposed of is required to be remediated under the CD. In 1987, 4,847 tons of PCB-contaminated materials were removed from the Anderson Road Landfill site and transported to the ISF at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant. In addition, an on-site pond was drained, and water and silt removed from the pond were transported to the ISF and a tertiary treatment lagoon at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant. Other interim measure activities included regrading, backfilling, and placing a clay cap on all excavated areas. A soil cover was placed on top of the final clay cap to support vegetation. In 1989, IDEM approved a request from Monroe County to use the Anderson Road Landfill site to dispose of solid waste as part of the Monroe County Landfill operations. The landfill is currently being used for solid waste disposal. 2.1.3 Nature of Contamination Past air, surface soil, subsurface soil, soil gas, surface water, and groundwater investigations have shown that PCBs, heptachlorodibenzofuran, and heptachlorodibenzodioxin are present at concentrations of concern in materials removed from the Anderson Road Landfill site (ISDH 1994). Table 2-1 summarizes the contaminated media and concentration ranges for these contaminants of concern. In addition, a variety of volatile organic compounds (VOC) were detected at low concentrations at the site. Although VOCs were detected at low concentrations, they may potentially be present in contaminated media at higher concentrations. Appendix D presents a summary of all compounds detected during field investigations at the Anderson Road Landfill site. 2.1.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements Remedial action of PCB-contaminated materials at the Anderson Road Landfill site was completed in 1987. Currently, 4,847 tons of contaminated material from the Anderson Road Landfill site are being stored at the ISF at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant. In addition, an on-site pond was drained, and water and silt removed from the pond were transported to the ISF and a tertiary treatment lagoon at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant. The CD requires that the material that was transferred to the ISF and tertiary treatment lagoon be treated during Phase II remediation. 2.2 BENNETT STONE QUARRY The sections below describe the Bennett Stone Quarry site, its site history, nature of contamination, and remediation requirements for the site as specified in the CD. 2.2.1 Site Description The Bennett Stone Quarry site (Figure 2-2), also known as Bennett's Dump, is located in a sparsely populated area of central Monroe County, Indiana. The site was historically used for quarry operations and currently consists of a 3.5-acre main fill area; an adjacent, smaller 0.5-acre fill area; and a very small fill area north of the other two fill areas (see Figure 2-2). Previously, the site also contained a pond; however, the pond was covered in 1983 during a federal emergency cleanup action. An active stone mill lies within 50 feet of the southwest corner of the site. Agricultural and cattle farms are located west and northwest of the site. Light manufacturing and some retail businesses are also present in the area. Star Quarry, an active limestone quarry, is immediately east of the site and has been occasionally used by local residents for swimming and hiking. Stout Creek, formerly used by local residents for watering cattle and swimming, runs north along the west side of the site. A residential development has been proposed in the area immediately west of Stout Creek across from the site. The Bennett Stone Quarry site is located on relatively flat terrain with moderate slopes. Limestone, fine-grained calcite, and grey-black shale underlie the soil layer at the site. Groundwater is 2.5 to 14 feet below ground surface (bgs) and flows west-northwest toward Stout Creek. 2.2.2 Site History From 1966 to 1980, the Bennett Stone Quarry site was used for dumping and scavenging PCB-contaminated electrical capacitors manufactured by Westinghouse. Other unknown industrial, commercial, and construction wastes were also disposed of at the Bennett Stone Quarry site. In early 1983, the site was revealed through a citizen complaint to the Monroe County Health Department. In May 1983, EPA conducted a site assessment that resulted in a federal emergency cleanup action in June 1983. This action included (1) removal of 252 capacitors and grossly contaminated surface soils; (2) aerial photographic, geophysical, and soil sampling surveys to determine the extent of PCB contamination; (3) construction of a 14- to 16-inch thick clay cap and 6-inch thick soil cover over the site; and (4) installation of security fencing around portions of the contaminated areas. In September 1984, the site was listed on the NPL. To comply with the interim remedial measures defined in the CD, Westinghouse has posted PCB warning signs along the length of Stout Creek bordering the site and maintained the integrity of the clay and vegetative cap over the site. Also, in accordance with the CD, PCB-contaminated stream sediments were removed by hydrovacuum from Stout Creek in 1987 and placed in the ISF at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant. 2.2.3 Nature of Contamination Past air, surface soil, subsurface soil, surface water, and groundwater investigations have shown that PCBs are present at concentrations of concern at the Bennett Stone Quarry site. Table 2-2 summarizes the media and concentration ranges for these contaminants of concern. Appendix D presents a summary of all compounds detected during field investigations at the Bennett Stone Quarry site. 2.2.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements The CD requires Westinghouse to excavate all PCB-contaminated material within the boundaries identified in Figure 2-2, including an additional 2 feet of soil below the solid waste. In areas where less than 2 feet of soil underlie the solid waste, Westinghouse is required to excavate all soil until bedrock is reached. Excavation of any large, quarried limestone blocks within the boundaries of the site will be left on site. According to the CD, an estimated 55,000 yd3 of material is to be excavated from the Bennett Stone Quarry site. 2.3 LEMON LANE LANDFILL The sections below describe the Lemon Lane Landfill site, its site history, nature of contamination, and remediation requirements for the site as specified in the CD. 2.3.1 Site Description The Lemon Lane Landfill site (Figure 2-3) is a 10-acre landfill located on the northwest side of the City of Bloomington in Monroe County, Indiana. A residential neighborhood is adjacent to the site to the east and within 1,000 feet of a residential neighborhood to the southwest. A railroad line and a cemetery border the site on the south. Undeveloped land owned by Westinghouse extends several hundred feet west of the site. The Bennett Stone Quarry site lies approximately 0.75 mile northwest of the site. A wooded area borders the site on the north. Approximately 300 residences are located within a 2,000 foot radius of the site. Areas of sensitive population are located within a 1- to 1.5-mile radius of the site, including students at schools. Indiana University is located 2 miles east of the site. Soils at the site consist of fill material and native soils ranging in depth from 10.5 to 43 feet bgs. Soil beneath the fill is made up of indigenous red clay. St. Louis Limestone and Salem Limestone underlie the soil. Karst and other surface water features identified around the landfill include numerous small sinkholes, caves, three creeks, fourteen perennial springs, fourteen intermittent springs, and one sinking stream. Bedrock dips southwest at approximately 30 feet per mile. A shallow aquifer located at approximately 27 to 38 feet bgs and a deep aquifer at 110 to 123 feet bgs are present beneath the site. Groundwater flow within the shallow zone during low-flow conditions is interpreted to flow southeast and eventually drain at a series of springs. During low-flow periods, groundwater in the deep aquifer flows north and northwest. During high-flow periods, flow is southeast and north to northeast. Residences and businesses within the immediate vicinity and downgradient of the site are served by a municipal water supply. 2.3.2 Site History In 1933, the Lemon Lane Landfill site was opened as a refuse dump in a large, elongated, compound sinkhole and valley approximately 30 feet deep. From 1950 to 1964, the City of Bloomington operated the municipal waste landfill, accepting PCB-contaminated electrical capacitors from Westinghouse from 1957 to 1964. During its operation, no records of types or quantities of waste disposed of at this site were kept (ISDH 1994). The site was not used for disposal after 1984. In June 1983, EPA installed a security fence around the perimeter of the site. The site was placed on the NPL in September 1983. In May 1987, interim removal and remedial actions began pursuant to the CD. After clearing the site of all trees and vegetation, Westinghouse removed exposed capacitors and transported them to the ISF. The eroded southern slope of the landfill was stabilized with a clay cap, and the entire site was covered with a synthetic liner. Approximately 30,000 tons of clean fill and a 36-mil plastic membrane cover were placed over the synthetic liner. In the summer of 1987 as part of the interim remedial measure, Westinghouse began hydrogeological investigations at the site requiring the installation of three on-site groundwater monitoring wells and two additional off-site monitoring wells. In September 1987, installation of gas collection and filter systems completed the interim remedial measure. 2.3.3 Nature of Contamination Past air, surface soil, subsurface soil, surface water, sediment, and groundwater investigations have shown that aluminum, cadmium, 2-methylnaphthalene, naphthalene, PCBs, tetrachloroethene, and trichloroethylene are present at concentrations of concern at the Lemon Lane Landfill site. Table 2-3 summarizes the contaminated media and concentration ranges for these contaminants of concern. In addition, a variety of other VOCs, metals, dioxins, and furans were detected at low concentrations at the site. Although these contaminants were detected at low concentrations, they may potentially be present in contaminated media at higher concentrations. Appendix D presents a summary of all compounds detected during field investigations at the Lemon Lane Landfill site. 2.3.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements Westinghouse is required to excavate the material within the boundaries identified in Figure 2-3. Westinghouse will conduct a sampling program to identify any remaining PCB-contaminated materials after completion of excavation. If remaining solid waste or soil contains PCBs in concentrations equal to or greater than 50 ppm, Westinghouse is also required to excavate and treat these materials. According to the CD, an estimated 176,000 yd3 of material is to be excavated from the Lemon Lane Landfill site. 2.4 NEAL'S DUMP The sections below describe the Neal's Dump site, its site history, nature of contamination, and remediation requirements for the site as specified in the CD. 2.4.1 Site Description The Neal's Dump site (Figure 2-4) is a 0.5-acre dump located in Owen County, Indiana. The City of Spencer, population 2,609, is approximately 4 miles north of the site. The primary land use in this rural area is agricultural, although the site is located in a small residential area. The nearest commercial area is located more than 1 mile from the site, and the nearest recreational area is located more than 2 miles from the site. Private residences are located within 1,000 feet of the site, the nearest residence bordering the site to the south. An estimated population of 954 resides within a 3-mile radius of the site, and approximately 65 individuals reside within a 0.25-mile radius of the site. Three aquifers underlie the site. A shallow, unconfined aquifer exists in the uppermost sandy silt unit at 12 to 15 feet bgs and flows from the site through a drainage ditch north of the site. The middle aquifer is located in a deeper sand unit at 37 to 45 feet bgs. The deep aquifer is in the lowest sand layer and flows west toward the White River, which is interpreted to be the discharge boundary for the deep aquifer. About 1,000 people within 3 miles of the site use private well water as a source of drinking water. No municipal water source is available. There are 49 wells within 1 mile of the site. The closest well is 50 feet from the site. Surface water runoff from the site flows in intermittent streams west and northwest and drains into the White River flood plain less than 0.25 mile west of the site. 2.4.2 Site History From approximately 1967 to 1971, Westinghouse disposed of capacitors and PCB-contaminated rags and sawdust at the Neal's Dump site. Sandy materials were deposited on the fill material as daily cover. PCB-contaminated liquids were reportedly drained from the capacitors by Westinghouse before the capacitors were transported to Neal's Dump for disposal. Westinghouse generated an estimated 75 percent by volume of the wastes disposed of at the Neal's Dump site (Davoli 1980). In December 1983, Westinghouse removed capacitors from the surface of the site and installed a clay cap, seeded the cap, and installed a security fence. Maintenance of the interim measure includes surface drainage control and monitoring. 2.4.3 Nature of Contamination Past air, surface soil, subsurface soil, surface water, sediment, and groundwater investigations have shown that PCBs are present at concentrations of concern at the Neal's Dump site. Table 2-4 summarizes the media and concentration ranges for these contaminants of concern. In addition, a variety of semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC) were detected at low concentrations at the site. Although the SVOCs were detected at low concentrations, they may potentially be present in contaminated media at higher concentrations. Appendix D presents a summary of all contaminants detected during field investigations at the Neal's Dump site. 2.4.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements Westinghouse is required to excavate all material within the boundaries identified in Figure 2-4 down to the till layer, including sandy materials deposited as daily cover. An additional 2 feet of soil remaining after removal of all materials is also required to be excavated and treated. An estimated 14,000 yd3 of materials is to be excavated from the Neal's Dump site. 2.5 NEAL'S LANDFILL The following sections describe the Neal's Landfill site, its site history, nature of contamination, and remediation requirements for the site as specified in the CD. 2.5.1 Site Description The Neal's Landfill site (Figure 2-5) occupies approximately 18 acres in a rural area of Monroe County, Indiana. The main fill area measures approximately 150 by 300 yards. Approximately 30 to 40 people live within a 0.5-mile radius of the site. Residences are present approximately 0.25 mile west and 0.5 mile north of the site. Immediately adjacent to the site on all sides are wooded areas. Richland Creek is located 1.5 miles northwest of the site. Soils at the site consist of silty clay to approximately 31 feet bgs. The limestone that underlies the site contains sinkholes, swallowholes, solution cavities, caves, seeps, and sinking or disappearing streams and springs. The limestone is composed of shale interbeds and chert beds. Bedrock at the site dips northwest, contrary to the southwest trend of regional bedrock. Discharges from two springs and a seep are handled by the Westinghouse spring treatment facility during low-flow periods. During high-flow conditions, the total flow from two springs and seep exceeds 1 cubic foot per second, and the discharge from the springs flows directly to Conard's Branch. The discharge from the seep flows directly to the southwest seep branch. Some residences rely on groundwater well supplies for drinking water. The water table is present at depths of up to 65 feet bgs. The number and depths of aquifers underlying the site are not known. Groundwater recharge is through sinkholes, swallowholes, joint sets, and solution cavities that intersect the land surface in the vicinity of the site. Groundwater flow beneath the site discharges to the surface at springs located within valleys northwest and southwest of the site. 2.5.2 Site History From 1950 to 1972, the Neal's Landfill site was used as an industrial and municipal waste landfill. No disposal operations occurred at the site after 1972. In 1966 and 1967, Westinghouse disposed of undrained capacitors and PCB-contaminated rags and sawdust at the landfill. The landfill reportedly contains about 1 percent by volume PCB-contaminated wastes generated by Westinghouse. About 60 to 70 percent of the wastes at the site were generated by other industries (Davoli 1980). In September 1983, the site was included on the NPL. In December 1983, Westinghouse removed capacitors from the surface of the site and installed a clay cap, erosion control fences, a security fence, and drainage control trenches. Areas that were visually inspected and appeared to be contaminated with significant amounts of oil and wastes were covered with a clay cap that was later seeded. From the summer of 1987 until October 1988, Westinghouse excavated sediment and stream banks from the headwaters of Conard's Branch to Richland Creek. Approximately 2,700 tons of sediment and 1,900 tons of stream bank were removed and transported to the ISF. On July 1, 1988, Westinghouse was issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit by IDEM requiring Westinghouse to operate a spring treatment facility during low- flow periods, sample the treatment facility's influent and effluent twice a month, and submit monitoring reports once a month. In February 1990, Westinghouse completed construction and began operation of the spring treatment system. The PCB discharge limit for the spring treatment facility was set at 1 ppb pursuant to the CD. 2.5.3 Nature of Contamination Past air, surface soil, surface water, sediment, and groundwater investigations have shown that PCBs are present at concentrations of concern at the Neal's Landfill site. Table 2-5 summarizes the media and concentration ranges for these contaminants of concern. In addition, a variety of VOCs and metals were detected at low concentrations at the site. Although the VOCs were detected at low concentrations, they may potentially be present in contaminated media at higher concentrations. Appendix D presents a summary of all compounds detected during field investigations at the Neal's Landfill site. 2.5.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements Westinghouse is required to excavate all materials within the boundaries identified in Figure 2-5, including all solid waste and an additional 2 feet of soil below the solid waste. In areas where less than 2 feet of soil underlie the solid waste, Westinghouse is required to excavate all soil to bedrock. In addition, Westinghouse is required to excavate materials from the five sinkholes shown in Figure 2-5 up to a maximum volume of 2,000 yd3. If the material in the sinkhole exceeds a volume of 2,000 yd3, the CD allows Westinghouse to propose an alternative remedial plan for the sinkholes. The surface-eroded sediments shown in Figure 2-5 will be excavated to a depth of 3 feet bgs. Solid wastes and an additional 2 feet of underlying soil will also be removed. In areas where less than 2 feet of soil underlie the sediment, Westinghouse is required to excavate all soil to bedrock. According to the CD, 320,000 yd3 of material is to be excavated from the Neal's Landfill site. 2.6 WINSTON-THOMAS SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT The following sections describe the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site, its site history, nature of contamination, and remediation requirements specified in the CD. 2.6.1 Site Description The Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site (see Figure 2-6) is an inactive sewage treatment plant located on the southwest side of Bloomington and owned by the City of Bloomington. The site consists of a 17-acre tertiary treatment lagoon, two abandoned sludge lagoons, three sludge drying beds, four digesters, a trickling filter, and several buildings. The 120- by 300-foot ISF is located next to the site. High schools are present within a 0.5- to 1.5-mile radius of the site. The site is surrounded by residential areas to the west and south and by commercial developments to the north and east. A residential area lies west of the site beyond Clear Creek and the Illinois Central Railroad tracks, which borders the site to the west. Approximately 500 people live within a 1-mile radius of the site. The site is located in the north to south trending valley of Clear Creek on a nearly level to moderately sloping plateau. Steep slopes are located along the berm edges of the tertiary treatment lagoon. The geology of the site consists of unconsolidated materials underlain by limestone interbedded with shale and siltstone bedrock. The unconsolidated material consists of fill materials and soil. Two types of fill materials are present: general fill and treatment process-related fill. General fill is approximately 0.9 to 10 feet thick and consists of clay and silt mixed with asphalt, ash concrete, gravel, nails, and roots. The treatment process-related fill includes the trickling filter media and sludge in the tertiary lagoon, abandoned lagoons, drying beds, and digesters. Sludge from the tertiary treatment process has been deposited in the tertiary lagoon. The sludge overlies a 1- to 2- foot thick clay liner that was placed during the construction of the tertiary lagoon in 1967. The tertiary lagoon has a berm of silty clay. The predominant soil throughout the site is a red-brown-yellow- grey silty clay and clayey silt 2.5 to 9 feet thick. Sand and gravel associated with the flood plain and stream bed deposits of Clear Creek and the former channel of Clear Creek are also present at the site. The first bedrock unit underlying the site consists of interbedded grey limestone and shale 22 to 36 feet thick. Siltstone and dolomite lenses also occur throughout this bedrock unit. The second layer is a confining layer that consists of dark gray, silty shale with pyrite specks. The groundwater flow system in the site area includes recharge areas, flow areas, and discharge areas. Recharge is believed to occur in the topographically higher areas east of the site. Beneath the site, groundwater is believed to flow predominantly in bedding planes, fractures, and joints in the upper bedrock unit and in the overlying unconsolidated material at some locations. Groundwater may flow within solution features, if present. In the northern portion of the site, groundwater flows more west-southwest, and in the central and southern areas of the site, it trends south-southwest. 2.6.2 Site History In November 1975, Westinghouse informed the City of Bloomington that it had been discharging PCBs into the city sewer system. Samples collected from various locations at the plant confirmed the presence of high concentrations of PCBs in sewage, tertiary treatment lagoon clay and sludge, digester tanks, and the trickling filter media at the plant. In 1982, the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site was shut down, and a new sewage treatment plant was opened at the Dillman Road Treatment Facility southwest of Bloomington. In July 1986, the Bloomington City Utilities Board approved temporary storage of contaminated material in an ISF on city property at the former Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site. Westinghouse constructed the ISF after approval and receipt of all necessary construction permits. In November 1990, Westinghouse notified CD parties that water had accumulated in three on-site, aboveground digester tanks and that the tanks were close to overflowing. Westinghouse removed and decontaminated 410,000 gallons of PCB-contaminated water from the digesters (ISDH 1994). Sludges and solids were left in the digester tanks. 2.6.3 Nature of Contamination Past groundwater, surface water, soil boring, sludge, and sediment investigations have shown that PCBs are present at concentrations of concern at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site. Table 2-6 summarizes the media and concentration ranges for the contaminant of concern. Appendix D presents a summary of all compounds detected during field investigations at the Winston- Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site. 2.6.4 Phase II Remediation Requirements According to the CD, Westinghouse is required to remove all water and materials in the tertiary treatment lagoon identified in Figure 2-6. Prior to discharge to the Dillman Road Treatment Facility, any water removed is required to be treated to remove PCBs to a concentration established by the State of Indiana and City of Bloomington pursuant to the authority granted to them under state and federal law. In addition, 6 inches of material from the clay liner underlying the lagoon is to be removed. Ten inches of the clay liner within a 50-foot radius of Boring Hole 14, identified in Figure 2-6, is to be removed. According to the CD, Westinghouse is required to excavate and remove any solid waste and sludge in the sludge drying beds within the boundaries identified in Figure 2-6 and an additional 2 feet of soil below the sludge. In addition, loose organic materials from the trickling filter media is to be removed. The trickling filter media will be cleaned and redeposited in the filter and covered. According to the CD, the contents of the abandoned lagoons are to be excavated to the top of the clay layer beneath the lagoon within the boundaries identified in Figure 2-6. In addition, 2 feet of additional soil underlying the contents of the abandoned lagoons will be excavated. Furthermore, solid waste in the digester tanks will be removed. Any sediments remaining in the site piping system will be flushed with water using high-pressure sewer cleaning equipment. All flushings will be transported to the tertiary treatment lagoon or other appropriate structure for processing and removal of PCBs pursuant to state permit requirements. Westinghouse is required to plug the pipes after flushing unless this plugging causes drainage problems. According to the CD, an estimated 50,000 yd3 of contaminated material is to be removed from the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant site. 2.7 SUMMARY OF MATERIALS TO BE TREATED For the purposes of identifying and screening remedial technologies, the contaminated materials at the six sites have been divided into primary and secondary contaminated materials. Primary materials are materials that would be treated in the proposed incinerator. The following list presents the primary types of contaminated material at the six sites that need to be treated: Soil and rock Sludge Sediment Solid waste, including municipal waste, demolition waste, and industrial waste Other secondary types of contaminated material must also be addressed. These materials are considered secondary because they will be treated using secondary support technologies instead of the primary treatment technology. These materials, which would not normally be incinerated, include the following: Water from the lagoon at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant Water and pipes contaminated with PCBs located at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant Decontamination water from truck and equipment washing and runon and runoff captured during excavation activities Evaluation of alternative treatment technologies for PCB- contaminated material requires knowledge of the waste characteristics, including the material's physical characteristics, volume, and chemical characteristics of hazardous substances in the material. The sections below discuss the general physical characteristics of the contaminated material at the six sites, the estimated volume of each type of contaminated material, and the chemical characteristics of primary contaminants of concern in the contaminated materials. 2.7.1 Physical Characteristics of Contaminated Materials Information about the physical characteristics of the contaminated material is needed for several reasons. First, the treatment effectiveness of each of the remediation technologies evaluated in this FS varies for different waste parameters such as moisture content, organic content, and soil type. In addition, some technologies require a higher degree of pretreatment materials handling than others. For example, technologies such as solvent extraction and thermal desorption have specific material sizing requirements that must be met before the material can be treated using these technologies. Also, regulations prohibit some contaminated materials from being treated using alternative treatment technologies. For example, capacitors containing concentrations of PCBs of greater than 500 ppm must be incinerated in accordance with TSCA, although exemptions are sometimes applicable to small capacitors. Limited data exists concerning the physical characteristics of many of the contaminated materials at the six sites. The sections below summarize the known characteristics of the contaminated materials. 2.7.1.1 Soil and Rock In general, the soil and rock to be excavated consists of native soils, clay liner material at the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant and other sites, and weathered bedrock. Native soils consist primarily of silty clay and silty loam material. These types of materials typically contain about 10 percent moisture and have an in-place density of 1.35 tons/yd3 (Means 1994). The bedrock is primarily limestone and shale. Because some of the sites are believed to have been filled-in sinkholes and quarried areas, large pieces of weathered bedrock may be encountered during excavation. 2.7.1.2 Sludge The sludge to be treated during Phase II remedial activities is assumed to be primary and biological sludge from the Winston- Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant. Sludge is present in the tertiary treatment lagoon, two abandoned lagoons, digester tanks, and the three sludge drying beds. The lagoon sludge would be conditioned with polymer and dewatered before further treatment. Although no specific information is available concerning the physical characteristics of the dewatered sludge, the physical makeup of the sludge can generally be assumed to be similar to other sewage treatment sludges. The total solids content of the dewatered sludge is estimated to be 30 percent. Approximately 40 percent of the total solids are volatile solids and 60 percent are nonvolatile solids. 2.7.1.3 Sediment The sediment to be treated during Phase II consists of stream sediment from Stout Creek, Clear Creek, and Richland Creek and surface-eroded sediment from the Neal's Landfill site. The sediment is commingled with stream bank soil and has been stored in the ISF since 1987. For the purpose of this FS, it is assumed that the sediment will have the same moisture content and in-place density as the site soils, which is estimated to be 10 percent and 1.35 tons/yd3, respectively. 2.7.1.4 Solid Waste The solid wastes at the Bennett's Stone Quarry, Lemon Lane Landfill, Neal's Dump, and Neal's Landfill sites are believed to be very heterogenous and therefore difficult to physically characterize. According to the ISDH report, the PCB-contaminated material was codisposed of with other landfill wastes (ISDH 1994). The Lemon Lane Landfill and Neal's Landfill sites were operated as municipal landfills and are therefore expected to contain typical municipal wastes as well as industrial and demolition wastes. Municipal waste landfills typically contain 60 percent municipal wastes, 30 percent industrial wastes, and 10 percent demolition wastes (Tchobanoglous and others 1977). The Bennett Stone Quarry and Neal's Dump sites were operated primarily as open dumps and are therefore expected to contain mostly industrial and demolition wastes. For the purpose of this FS, it is assumed that the Bennett Stone Quarry and Neal's Dump sites contain about 75 percent industrial wastes and 25 percent demolition waste. Municipal waste may include the following waste types: Food wastes Paper and cardboard Plastics Textiles and leather Wood Glass Metal wastes (including tin cans and aluminum) Leaves and other yard wastes Consumer electronics (televisions, for example) White goods and other appliances (refrigerators, for example) Batteries Oil Tires Household hazardous wastes Animal carcasses The general components and proximate analysis of typical municipal solid wastes are presented in Tables 2-7 and 2-8, respectively. For the purposes of this FS, the municipal solid wastes are assumed to have a bulk density of 0.5 tons/yd3 (Tchobanoglous and others 1977). Flammable materials such as paper and wood were combusted before final disposal at some sites; therefore, some sites may have smaller fractions of flammable materials than indicated in Table 2-7. Industrial wastes may include the following waste types: PCB capacitors Drums containing inorganic and organic product and waste Laboratory waste Discarded industrial equipment Low-level radioactive mixed waste Fly ash Industrial absorbents and rags Ceramics Street sweepings Miscellaneous metal objects Testimony from a Westinghouse waste hauler indicates that three or four types of capacitors were disposed of at the sites (excluding the Winston-Thomas Sewage Treatment Plant). The largest capacitors were rectangular and measured 4 inches by 14 inches by 24 inches, and the smallest capacitors measured 12 inches high and 9 inches in diameter (Davoli 1980). The waste hauler also indicated that before 1967, Westinghouse disposed of capacitors without draining the oil. However, Westinghouse began draining the oil from the capacitors in 1967. The waste hauler reported that the Neal's Landfill site received undrained capacitors and that the Neal's Dump site received drained capacitors. The general components and proximate analysis of the industrial wastes at the Neal's Landfill site cannot be predicted with the information available. For the purposes of this FS, the industrial wastes are assumed to have a bulk density of 1.0 tons/yd3. Demolition wastes typically consist of construction debris such as broken concrete, reinforced concrete, wood, pipes, roofing materials, and sheet metal. For the purposes of this FS, the demolition wastes are assumed to have a bulk density of 1.5 tons/yd3 and a negligible moisture content. 2.7.2 Volume of Contaminated Materials Volume estimates for the various types of contaminated material at each of the six CD sites were calculated using available site information and the total waste volumes presented in the CD for the six sites. Table 2-9 presents the volumes of the primary types of contaminated materials at each of the sites. Appendix A presents the detailed contaminated material volume calculations. 2.7.3 Chemical Characteristics of Primary Contaminants of Concern For the purposes of this FS, the primary contaminants of concern at the six sites are PCBs. Dioxins and furans, which are typically found in conjunction with PCBs and are highly toxic, have also been detected at some of the sites. They are also therefore considered primary contaminants of concern. Other contaminants have been detected at concentrations of concern (ISDH); however, the CD did not establish cleanup standards or goals for these contaminants. Therefore, this FS does not address remediation of other contaminants of concern but generally considers the contaminants' impact on the effectiveness and implementation of treatment technologies for PCB-contaminated material. This section presents background information on the chemical identity and the chemical and physical properties of PCBs and dioxins and furans. These physical and chemical parameters are important when evaluating remedial technologies such as thermal desorption, solvent extraction, and soil washing. 2.7.3.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls A PCB is any one of 209 compounds of carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and chlorine (Cl) described by the general formula C12HxCly, where x = 0 to 9 and y = 10 - x. PCBs are produced by chlorination of the biphenyl compound, which has 10 positions (labeled 2-6 and 2 -6 below): [this figure not reproduced on the BBS] Commercial PCBs were produced by collecting boiling point fractions during distillation of chlorinated biphenyl mixtures. Most PCBs manufactured in the United States were produced by Monsanto Chemical Company under the trademark "Aroclor." Each Aroclor is assigned a four-digit number. For most PCB Aroclors such as Aroclor 1242, the first two numbers indicate the 12 carbons in the biphenyl ring, and the last two numbers indicate the weight percent of chlorine. Aroclor 1016, which is similar to Aroclor 1242, was not named in accordance with the standard convention. Table 2-10 presents the molecular weight, boiling point range, vapor pressure, and vaporization rate for various Aroclors. These parameters are important when evaluating the thermal desorption technology. For example, soil temperature in the thermal desorption processor must exceed the boiling point of the chemical. In general, the boiling point range increases and the vapor pressure and vaporization rate decrease with increasing molecular weight. The predominant Aroclors detected at the CD sites are Aroclors 1016, 1042, and 1248. 2.7.3.2 Dioxins and Furans Dioxins and furans are typically detected in conjunction with certain precursor compounds such as PCBs. A dioxin is any of a family of compounds known chemically as dibenzo-p-dioxins. Each of these compounds has as a nucleus a triple-ring structure consisting of two benzene rings interconnected to each other through a pair of oxygen atoms, as shown below: [this figure not reproduced on the BBS] Each of the substituent positions, numbers 1 through 4 and 6 through 9, can hold a Cl or other halogen atom, an organic radical, or an H atom. The only structural differences in members of the dioxin family are in the nature and position of substituents. Dibenzofuran is an organic compound that contains two benzene rings fused to a central furan ring. Polychlorinated dibenzofurans are a class of organic compounds in which one to eight Cl atoms are attached to the benzene ring positions of a dibenzofuran structure. The general chemical structure for chlorinated dibenzofurans with the numbering system for the Cl substituents is as follows: [this figure not reproduced for the BBS] Because of the toxicity of dioxins and furans, experiments to measure the chemical parameters of the compounds have been limited; therefore, the values of these chemical parameters are not well known. A vapor pressure correlation method, however, has been used to estimate the boiling points (Rordorf 1989). The estimated boiling points are presented in Table 2-11. The adsorption coefficient (Koc) of a compound is important when evaluating the relative difficulty of removing contaminants from wastes. Koc is a measure of the tendency of a compound to adsorb to the organic carbon in soils. The Koc of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) (4.7 x 105) indicates that it is strongly sorbed to soils; however, the Koc is somewhat reduced under alkaline conditions and when other contaminants such as waste oil are present (Puri and others 1989). Its high Koc combined with its very low water solubility makes 2,3,7,8-TCDD very immobile in most soils (Puri and others 1989). It could be assumed that other dioxins and furans have similar characteristics. The high Koc value of 2,3,7,8-TCDD, and presumably of all dioxins and furans, indicates that they are strongly sorbed to the organic fraction of soil.